|
We are all called to a path in which to travel. As we take this road it
is hoped we will experience, learn and grow. For the most part this is
not only an ideal but a constant of humanity. Over 22 years as a Dom and
Top I have learned, made mistakes and changed philosophies. I went from
being a baby Dom to hopefully a more mature one. But, sadly along the
way, a few "submissives" paid the price for
my education. This is nothing new in life merely a truth, but no less
regrettable. To those sub's whom I may have hurt
in some way, I do so apologize.
When I was an infant
Dominant. (High School)
When I was just starting out and was in what I call
infant Dom-hood, Dominance and sex were irrevocably linked. I can say
honestly, in my mind the two went hand in hand. Fortunately, I was never
one of those "on your knees bitch suck my cock" types. During those
years I was enlightened enough not to think being a Master meant getting
a blowjob whenever I wanted. Yet like most newbie Dom / Dommes I succumbed
to the intoxication of my new found pleasure area. At that stage of my
life, all submissives were at best weak and at worst our playthings to
enjoy. After all, submissives needed us Doms in order for them to exist.
When I was a young Dominant
(Associates Level)
I believed the measure of one's Dom-hood was the
number of subs a Dominant had. My thoughts about Dom-hood often began
with; "A true Dominant is..." Like many, I sought to prove my power
by the size of my stable. In those days, a young Dominant believes the
more the merrier and the greater his/her power. After all, you must
be a great Dom if you have 3 or more subs or slaves. Often this is the
stage where we espouse the "submission
is a gift" philosophy. We are still full of ourselves
and by calling it a gift we perpetuate our ego feeding. For one must be
"a true Dominant" if I have 5 subs offering up the "gift
of submission". This being the case no wonder so many
Dominants never grow beyond this stage and frankly why should they. It
was during this time I saw little difference between the "sub" and the
"slave". I still thought 24/7 D/s was possible, that all things being
as we fantasized Doms would always be Doms and subs would always submit.
When I was an adolescent
Dominant (Bachelor level)
Over the years I have also observed this is the highest
level some "players"
will ever achieve. There comes a point of separation between "the
player" and "the Lifestyler"; from
my perspective it is at this level the split becomes most obvious.
For the player this is still just about
"kinky sex" and more interesting ways to "get off" except
now they have become more sophisticated about achieving this goal. I do
believe however, it is here many players become aware of the fact their
"could be" more. But so few ever get beyond this point to ask the next
important question. "Is there more ... and how do I find it?" In a relationship
with a "young Dominant Player", sub/slave at first finds it is all one
could ever dream. Yet, over time with the player, the D/s takes a back
seat, as more conventional aspects begin to creep into the relationship.
Suddenly one day the Dom or the sub/slave wakes up and realizes their
D/s relationship has turned "vanilla" with
occasional weekend D/s et al. This is not to say it does not happen to
"Lifestylers" as well, it does but with a slightly
different nuance.
At this stage, I learned for myself that 24/7 D/s
as it is fantasized doesn't exist except for the very rich. Otherwise,
you have life, work, bills and in many relationships.. children. For the
working class lifestyler the nature of their D/s relationship changes
to fit their life circumstance. Be it stolen moments during the day or
to when the kids go to bed. But unlike the player, it IS generally
always there (a mind set) just beneath the
surface, waiting for but a moment's opportunity as opposed to "only weekends".
At this point along the path, there are lifestylers
who believe they know it all and a sub/slave has little or nothing to
teach them. Many are still very physical and demonstrate this by their
great prowess with a flogger, whip, edge play or their knowledge of "protocol"
chapter and verse. In short, still very external or "toy bag" and
equipment dependent.
When I was an adult Dominant
(Master's Level)
I came to feel submission to be less of a gift and
more of a "fact" of being, whether you were sub or slave. You need to
submit therefore you "are" and no less for being so. The questions also
changed. I no longer asked, "Is
there more?" For
now, I could see the mountain once obscured by clouds before me. Instead,
I began to ask "What is
it and how do I get there?"
Yet, somehow other questions begin to bubble to the
surface, " is this all
there is?"
About this time, I discovered I had less interest
in "subs" and more interest in "slaves". A slave requires A LOT more care
and attention than a sub. Therefore, in my view a slave is NOT
for the young DOM. A "natural" slave must be treasured and protected.
For they have the capacity to surrender so completely that in many cases,
there can be loss of self. Although, let me point out I have also seen
"natural" slaves through their complete submission, find their sense of
self as well.
Whether submissive or slave I learned it is my duty
to take them, possess them and guide them to their best potential. Part
of my job, as a Dominant is to help the sub/slave be the best they can
be and to grow in ways they never dreamed of.
(Doctorate level studies)
Whether or not I am now a mature Dominant only time
will tell but I'd like to think my philosophies have come of age. I no
longer link sex and Dominance, for Dominance is about control.
As have written in the past:,
"A Dominants power comes from within
not from the end of a flogger. If you are not in control of yourself,
then how can you be in control of someone else ?"
This control can be manifested in many ways, sex
and sexual acts being one of them, but you can be a Dom and NOT
have sex. Submissives come in many flavors, some are weak and some are
strong. Strong or weak has little to do with BDSM and everything to do
with who they are. Incidentally, some of the strongest souls I
have met have been submissives. Submission is a natural part of the human
existence, like YIN and YANG,
light and dark. It is NOT so much a gift, but just is... a part
of nature. In time, I realized your stable doesn't measure your Dom-hood.
For in my view anything more than two subs, is NOT
wise overall. You maybe Doming them, but you are probably not doing it
well. To divide your essential energies, in more then two directions leads
to eventual burn out or failure. In the end, you have several unhappy
and unfulfilled subs/slaves. To call yourself a Dom is easy; to be an
effective one, there lay the challenge.
To be able to call yourself a slave you should have
virtually no limits, for as your Dom I can do with you as I please, use
you or have you "used" as I see fit. The submissive has
similar yet different needs. A sub has negotiated limits; they can, from
the beginning, determine their depth of surrender. If things get
too intense they can "safe out" and bring an end to the scene, where a
slave cannot.
Time has taught me, a sub/slave can also lead. Even
though they are a sub/slave and submit to their DOM. that is a reflection
of who they are and NOT what they can do. You may be my slave, but you
are also mother, Lawyer, Doctor or police officer, (even when you are
wearing your Masters butt plug while at work *smile*). In the modern world
of D/s, you are sub/slave to me, but competent and in control in other
areas of your life or those I grant you. I love the saying,
'I'm submissive NOT stupid'.
These are some of the lessons I have learned as I
have walked my path. Some questions along the way have been answered,
to then only to be replaced by new ones. This I suppose is as it should
be. Yet in the end I can't help wonder about one of the greater truths
of (24/7 D/s) what we do.
Is
it a vanilla relationship with elements of D/s..
or a D/s relationship with merely elements of vanilla?
|